While commemorating the progression of equal rights in the United States, I feel inclined to proffer my readers with excerpts from Abraham Lincoln's debate with Senator Stephen A. Douglas in 1858. Lincoln made a clear stand on the imperative need to end slavery's growth and move toward it's eventual abolition, come what may, in spite of the feeling that there was no good solution. The economy seemed to depend wholly on it's perpetuation.
(And despite what I hear on the radio from the black community- that Martin Luther King, Jr Day is their day- I would remind them that this is my day, too. My values have been championed in this fight, also.)
(And despite what I hear on the radio from the black community- that Martin Luther King, Jr Day is their day- I would remind them that this is my day, too. My values have been championed in this fight, also.)
"Before proceeding, let me say I think I have no prejudice against the Southern people. They are just what we would be in their situation. If slavery did not now exist among them, they would not introduce it. If it did now exist among us, we should not instantly give it up. This I believe of the masses North and South. Doubtless there are individuals on both sides who would not hold slaves under any circumstances; and others who would gladly introduce slavery anew, if it were out of existence. We know that some Southern men do free their slaves, go North, and become tip-top Abolitionists; while some Northern ones go South, and become most cruel slave-masters.
When Southern people tell us they are no more responsible for the origin of slavery than we, I acknowledge the fact. When it is said that the institution exists, and that it is very difficult to get rid of it in any satisfactory way, I can understand and appreciate the saying. I surely will not blame them for not doing what I should not know how to do myself. If all earthly power were given me, I should not know what to do as to the existing institution. My first impulse would be to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia - to their own native land. But a moment's reflection would convince me that whatever of high hope (as I think there is) there may be in this in the long run, its sudden execution is impossible. If they were all landed there in a day, they would all perish in the next ten days; and there are not surplus shipping and surplus money enough in the world to carry them there in many times ten days. What then? Free them all, and keep them among us as underlings? Is it quite certain that this betters their condition? I think I would not hold one in slavery at any rate; yet the point is not clear enough to me to denounce people upon. What next? Free them, and make them politically and socially our equals? My own feelings will not admit of this; and if mine would, we well know that those of the great mass of white people will not. Whether this feeling accords with justice and sound judgment is not the sole question, if indeed, it is any part of it. A universal feeling, whether well or ill-founded, cannot be safely disregarded. We cannot make them equals. It does seem to me that systems of gradual emancipation might be adopted; but for their tardiness in this, I will not undertake to judge our brethren of the South.When they remind us of their constitutional rights, I acknowledge them, not grudgingly, but fully and fairly; and I would give them any legislation for the reclaiming of their fugitives, which should not, in its stringency, be more likely to carry a free man into slavery, than our ordinary criminal laws are to hang an innocent one.
But all this, to my judgment, furnishes no more excuse for permitting slavery to go on in our own free territory, than it would for reviving the African slave trade by law. The law which forbids the bringing of slaves from Africa, and that which has so long forbidden the taking of them to Nebraska, can hardly be distinguished on any moral principle; and the repeal of the former could find quite as plausible excuses as that of the latter."
I appreciate that Lincoln puts the morality/character of both the North and South on equal ground. He doesn't create divisions but points out how they are all the same. He isn't apt to judge. Lincoln also respects an ideal even though he can't offer a solution of how to get there. Even though Lincoln can't figure out how to reach the ideal or even hope for the ideal, he recognizes what is able to be done in the moment and offers solutions that are immediately viable.
But all this, to my judgment, furnishes no more excuse for permitting slavery to go on in our own free territory, than it would for reviving the African slave trade by law. The law which forbids the bringing of slaves from Africa, and that which has so long forbidden the taking of them to Nebraska, can hardly be distinguished on any moral principle; and the repeal of the former could find quite as plausible excuses as that of the latter."
I appreciate that Lincoln puts the morality/character of both the North and South on equal ground. He doesn't create divisions but points out how they are all the same. He isn't apt to judge. Lincoln also respects an ideal even though he can't offer a solution of how to get there. Even though Lincoln can't figure out how to reach the ideal or even hope for the ideal, he recognizes what is able to be done in the moment and offers solutions that are immediately viable.
1 comment:
Charlotte, I really enjoyed your post and hopefully it is ok if I leave a few of my own thoughts. I love that you pointed out that Lincoln recognized a problem but sought to solve it as peacefully and tactfully as possible. I, like you, think that Martin Luther King Day is a celebration for all to remember all the liberties and freedoms we enjoy and not only as citizens of the US but as human beings with inherent rights and abilities. I want to share with you a quote that I really like from Justice Harlans dissent on Plessy v. Ferguson, "The white race deems itself to be the dominant race in this country. And so it is in prestige, in achievements, in education, in wealth and in power. So, I doubt not, it will continue to be for all time if it remains true to its great heritage and holds fast to the principles of constitutional liberty. But in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law. The humblest is the peer of the most powerful. The law regards man as man, and takes no account of his surroundings or of his color when his civil rights as guaranteed by the supreme law of the land are involved. It is therefore to be regretted that this high tribunal, the final expositor of the fundamental law of the land, has reached the conclusion that it is competent for a State to regulate the enjoyment by citizens of their civil rights solely upon the basis of race." Once again, thanks for sharing the wise wors from Lincoln, I hope all is well.
Jesse
Post a Comment